Support us

DonateNow Clean Water for North Carolina is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization.

Upcoming Events

Chatham County Board of Commissioners Meeting: Monday, July 17th at 6:00pm. Pittsboro Historic Court House. A public hearing will be held on extending the moratorium on hydraulic fracturing by one year. Chatham residents may also comment on the proposal by emailing lindsay.ray@chathamnc.org.

ACP Public Hearings on Water /Wetland 401 Permits (sign up begins 5:00 pm):
July 18: Fayetteville, 6:00 – 9:00 pm, Fayetteville Technical Community College, Cumberland Hall Auditorium, 2201 Hull Rd.

July 20: Rocky Mount, 6:00 – 9:00 pm, Nash Community College, Brown Auditorium, 522 N. Old Carriage Rd.

ASK Governor Cooper to VETO House Bill 467, Call 919-814-2000!

House Bill 467 is a terrible injustice to NC residents living near Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) and a frightening precedent for what other industries could do. This bill would hurt residents in NC living near CAFOs that want to sue Smithfield’s Hog Production Division due to the pollution caused by Smithfield’s hogs. Future lawsuits would have a cap on compensation that could be awarded to residents from a corporate pork producer making record profits ($1.7 billion in 2016).

Property Owner Rights: CAFOs produce waste which can contaminate ground water, as well as become a nuisance to residents living nearby who have to live with the stench. This bill eliminates compensation even when these impacts are proven in court. This bill would also reduce options for homeowners to protect themselves when CAFOs unreasonably interfere with their use of their property.

Environmental Justice Issues: Most CAFOs are located in low-income areas or communities of color (e.g., Duplin County, NC). These communities disproportionately suffer from the pollution caused by these operations. By taking away available legal remedies, this bill is especially harmful to these vulnerable populations. CAFOs also impact property values nearby, and threaten drinking water wells.

Special thanks to Christine Ellis of the Winyah Rivers Foundation for information on this harmful bill. 

Drinking Water & Democracy at Stake: Call your NC lawmakers this week to weigh in

This week, lawmakers are beginning to discuss and pass dozens of bills that have been introduced this spring, in order to pass as many as possible before an important deadline on Thursday, April 27. Please call or e-mail your legislators today and weigh in on several key bills with huge implications for NC drinking water, environmental justice, and democracy!

To find the names and phone numbers of the legislators for your area, go to tinyurl.com/ncreps17 and scroll down to enter your county. Click on each legislator’s name to view their phone number and e-mail address.

Ask them to:

(1) OPPOSE House Bill 351 – don’t create incentives to privatize public water supplies. The bill would make it easier for for-profit water companies to buy communities’ water or sewer services, by driving up the price. They could charge the ratepayers to pay themselves back plus a profit! NC should put more funding toward maintaining public drinking water supplies and infrastructure, not facilitate purchase of these essential services by for-profit companies who are less accountable to the public.

(2) OPPOSE House Bill 467 – don’t limit the ability of communities near hog farms to seek compensation for health effects, nuisance odors, loss of income and other impacts. Don’t shield pork producers from being accountable to nearby residents–mostly poor, African-American communities in Eastern NC. (This bill has passed the House already, so please call your Senator).

(3) OPPOSE House Bill 576 – don’t allow spraying of landfill leachate without air permits! There has not been adequate scientific study of whether the aersolization of landfill leachate is safe, and the bill would waive air pollution permits for the process, so we are deeply concerned about this process being approved and used. In videos of the process, it does not appear as self-contained as the proponents have claimed!

(4) SUPPORT House Bill 825 to protect children in schools from lead exposure! The bill requires testing for lead in water supplies in child care facilities and elementary schools. If lead is found above a certain threshold, teachers and parents must be notified and access provided to a safe water supply.

(5) SUPPORT Senate Bill 554 and House Bill 714 – create a committee to study how to establish new voting districts in a non-partisan way to represent all of North Carolina. It’s time to end gerrymandering and come up with a fair system for redistricting.

Thanks for taking action! Check back often for updates and additional recommendations for taking action.

Duke Energy seeks to recover ash cleanup cost from customers!

Ratepayers beware: Coal ash cost should be viewed separately from Duke’s operational expenses.

Public comment needed by April 12!

What can ratepayers and impacted communities do?
Public input is needed as Duke Energy seeks to recover coal ash cleanup cost from the more than 3 million NC costumers who rely on the utility as their sole electricity provider. Delaying the coal ash costs would allow the company to lump coal ash expenses with other operational cost such as, “environmental compliance” in a general rate case that would be held sometime later in the year. Delaying ash cleanup cost could distract from the actual expenses and threatening impacts of coal ash.

The North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) will soon make a decision on Duke Energy’s request to delay a review of coal ash cleanup costs until the next general rate case. Duke Energy must provide a 6 month formal notice before a general rate case is held. At this point, there is not a public hearing or comment period scheduled for Duke Energy’s coal ash cost deferment request.

However, you can email Utilities Commission Chairman Ed Finley and request a public hearing in your area on Duke Energy’s decision to delay coal ash costs for review in a later rate case. Emails should be sent to statements@ncuc.net with “DOCKET NO. E-2, SUB 1103/NO. E-7, SUB 1110” in the subject line by April 12th.

How much is Duke Energy asking from ratepayers at this time?
Duke Energy has not said exactly how much the rate hikes associated with coal ash cleanup would affect customer rates, but has requested to delay $726 million spent in coal ash cleanup expenses until the next general rate case, later in the year.

Pushing cost back for review in a general rate case at a later date by the NCUC is also known as a “deferment.” The NCUC would have to agree on Duke’s request in order to push back coal ash cleanup cost until a general rate case before cleanup cost could be passed on to customers. Duke Energy’s deferment request (Docket No. E-2, Sub 1103 and E-7, Sub 1110).

Duke Energy estimates about $5 billion as its baseline for the cleanup of its unlined coal ash basins in North and South Carolina. As the company spends money on cleanups, it plans to charge those cost to its ratepayers. In its year-end earnings report 2016, Duke Energy says “multiple” North Carolina rate hikes are very likely by 2021. More…

ONE MORE DAY TO COMMENT ON ACP!

ONLY ONE MORE DAY to send ACP DEIS Comments to FERC!

Please note corrected Docket Number,  CP15-554-000

The Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s impacts on eastern NC and global climate impacts, will be substantial, but FERC officials are claiming there will be “no significant impacts.” YOUR comments are important to let them know the public sees the truth.  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which grants the final certification for gas pipelines, needs to have YOUR comments by the deadline April 6th on the deeply flawed ACP Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS-click here for full document)!

Here’s are some of the worst problems with the DEIS: Impacts on communities of color and low income communities are claimed to be insignificant. Promised jobs and economic benefits are exaggerated. There’s extremely poor assessment or missing information on environmental, climate, cumulative impacts and safety risks (see more detail in the links below).

When you write your comments in your own words, be SURE to point out that this pipeline is simply NOT needed for economic development, according to a report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, and will contribute substantially to climate change. Another recent study concludes that releases of unburned natural gas from gas fired power plants may be 2 to 120 times higher than previously reported to EPA!   And THAT’S where most of the gas flowing through the ACP would go—to Duke’s and Dominion’s gas fired power plants!

Please use the links below to help you draft comments IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Instructions for submitting them are below the links. THANK YOU FOR TAKING ACTION!!

Socioeconomic Issues and Environmental Justice
Safety Issues in DEIS
Groundwater Resources
Surface Water and Wetlands
Compressor Stations and Air Quality

How to Submit Your Comments on ACP DEIS to FERC by express mail or by e-comment.

By mail: (FERC recommends you send hard copy comments by overnight express, to prevent long delays while checking your letter for anthrax!)

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20426      BE SURE TO SPECIFY DOCKET NUMBER CP15-554-000

To file your comments electronically: 
Select the points about which you are the most concerned and write them in your own words into a text file such as WORD. Go to https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx to fill out the required short comment registration form.

You will then be sent a link from FERC to submit your e-comment. Click on that link, and be sure to enter the Docket number CP15-554-000. Copy and paste your comments from your text file, up to 6,000 characters, into the comment form by Thursday, April 6 and submit! You can comment more than once if your comments are longer or if you wish to add to them.