• Global Ramifications, Local Impact – Microsoft’s AI Pollution Footprint

    Read the Report! Global Ramifications, Local Impact – Microsoft’s AI Pollution FootprintOur friends at STAND have released a new report looking Microsoft's AI pollution footprint. Clean Water for North Carolina was glad to help out, by highlighting the impact that Microsoft has on the type of energy we use in North Carolina. Microsoft’s North American AI data center build-out is set to drive a massive 600% increase in the company’s energy demand. What will that mean for states like North Carolina? Microsoft's hunger for electricity is being used as a justification to build expensive methane gas power plants and pipelines. Check out the North Carolina case study in this report to learn how. Read the Report! Key findings 1. In North America, electricity demand from Microsoft data centers is expected to increase over 600% from 2024 levels by 2030. That’s enough to power nearly 10 million U.S. households for a year – or almost the entire electricity consumption of the entire New England region. If this demand is met by fossil fuels, both local and climate pollution will skyrocket. 2. In the U.S., most states where Microsoft data centers are located rely on grid electricity that is ≥50% fossil fuel generated. Microsoft’s investment into PPAs is laudable, but many projects are located in areas far away from its data centers and these projects do not exclusively provide renewable energy. This indicates, despite claims of matching 100% of its electricity demand with renewable purchases by 2025, the data centers themselves are still dependent on fossil fuels. 3. Microsoft’s data center emissions (scope 1 and 2) reached over 7.87 million metric tons CO2e globally in FY23 – equivalent to more than the annual climate pollution generated by the state of Vermont. This report finds that 95.68% of Microsoft’s global operational emissions in FY23 were from data centers, which drives the company’s rising climate pollution. The company’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) increased by 55.38% between FY2013 and FY24 showing an ongoing upward trend.14 4. Obfuscated colocation data means the total impacts of Microsoft’s data centers are likely even higher than reported or projected. Like many big tech companies, Microsoft outsources much of its data center needs to third-party, colocation facilities. As of June 2024, Microsoft had the largest share of pre-leased capacity in colocation data centers – more than the other four major hyperscalers combined.15 By not clearly disclosing the energy consumed and emissions generated by its outsourced data services, Microsoft is not revealing the full extent of its climate and local pollution impacts. 5. Increased demand for energy leads to new fossil fuel facilities being built or existing ones staying online longer. Often this can occur in communities already suffering from high amounts of pollution, like the small community of Person County, North Carolina. The sheer scale of Microsoft’s AI data center buildout may have global implications for the climate, but it also comes with serious impacts for local communities. Additionally, these data centers contribute to higher electricity rates and raise concerns over water supply in the regions where they are clustered. The findings exemplify a clear connection between AI development and fossil fuel build out, a concerning lack of transparency into data center energy consumption and sourcing, and serious shortcomings in Microsoft’s community benefit practices. Take ActionTell Microsoft to act like a climate leader Microsoft has a history of being a climate leader, but the AI data center boom is throwing that all off track. Our new research1 shows that not only are most Microsoft data centers located in states with grid electricity that is ≥50% fossil fuel generated – but fossil fuel lobbyists are using new Microsoft data centers as evidence that we need to build out even more fossil fuel infrastructure. With Microsoft’s data center energy demand set to equal that of the entire New England region by 2030, the company has a choice – does it want to be a climate leader or does it want to fan the flames of the crisis? STAND is calling on Microsoft to ensure its new AI data centers are powered by local, 24/7, additional renewable energy, and provide substantial benefits for the surrounding community. Add your voice, sign the petition today! Sign the Petition!


    Continue reading
  • PRESS RELEASE: New Maps Show Transco & Other Proposed Pipelines’ Threat to Drinking Water in North Carolina and Virginia

    CONTACT Stephanie Gans, Assistant Director, steph@cwfnc.org   Kernersville, N.C. — On Wednesday, August 27, Clean Water for North Carolina released new, interactive maps highlighting drinking water sources threatened by three proposed methane gas pipelines in North Carolina and Virginia. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company’s proposed Southeast Supply Enhancement Project (SSEP) Pipeline, crossing through densely populated areas in Guilford and Forsyth Counties, poses the greatest threat to NC drinking water of the three. These maps provide the public with valuable information ahead of public hearings on whether the state should approve SSEP’s 401 water quality certification application. North Carolinians and Virginians near any of the proposed routes can use the maps to identify if their drinking water source is at risk of contamination due to pipeline impacts. SSEP Pipeline is a proposed 42-inch diameter high-pressure, methane gas pipeline. It would cross multiple states, starting in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, and out to Coosa County, Alabama. 28.4 miles of new pipe are proposed for North Carolina in Rockingham, Guilford, Forsyth, and Davidson counties. It would require the expansion of two gas-fired compressor stations in Iredell and Davidson counties, which would produce air pollution. SSEP’s proposed route puts it close to existing Transco pipelines. In Rockingham County, the pipeline would follow closely along the proposed route for Mountain Valley Pipeline Southgate, crossing many of the same waterways, also magnifying the potential for impacts to groundwater. The proposal to install multiple high-pressure, large-diameter pipelines on similar routes has inspired vocal opposition at public hearings. Guilford County passed a resolution citing safety concerns in response. The town of Midway passed a resolution of opposition in May. Community members facing further land seizure by Transco for the SSEP, have expressed skepticism of their safety record and water pollution controls. “I have lived with the three despicable Transco pipelines running through my farm and community for over 60 years. Now, Transco wants to install a fourth pipeline referred to as SSEP.” said, Ron Ray, a resident of Guilford County, “Beaver Creek runs over the pipelines on my farm and has always been a potential source of contamination for water running into the creek, rivers, and waters on to the Atlantic Ocean. The SSEP construction will certainly cause damage to these waterways  during construction and increase the risks of severe damage for generations to come.  I plead that this project be not permitted for the sake of the health and safety of future generations.” Pollution from pipeline construction or leaks during operation can harm rivers, streams, public water supplies, and private wells all along the route. The pipelines are proposed near communities that have already suffered groundwater contamination from coal ash, in order to supply new gas turbines proposed by Duke Energy in Person and Catawba Counties. “We released these maps to empower residents with information that often stays buried in long permit applications. That way, we can act to protect our communities. Private well users within 1000ft of the proposed pipelines are at risk of contamination of their groundwater or even a decrease in water supply. These maps can help them identify if their wells are at risk.” said Steph Gans, Assistant Director of Clean Water for North Carolina,  “Clean water is not the only thing on the line. These pipelines would supply new power plants adding to unhealthy air in communities. They will increase already high gas and electric bills. They threaten drinking water supplies, which could raise water bills. Using methane will worsen climate change, which caused damaging storms like Hurricane Helene and Tropical Storm Chantal. Both storms imposed huge costs on local water utilities and left North Carolinians without clean drinking water for days or weeks.” The maps show the threat to beloved local waterways across three watersheds: the Roanoke, Cape Fear, and Yadkin-Pee Dee. SSEP would cross the headwaters of the Haw River and the Dan River, which are sources of drinking water for NC communities. They show public water supplies from groundwater, some of which are perilously close to the SSEP pipeline’s route. “Projects like this create irreparable damage on our sensitive aquatic ecosystems and pose serious risks for downstream communities that depend on our rivers and streams for drinking water supplies.” said Emily Sutton, Haw Riverkeeper and Executive Director of Haw River Assembly, “These maps help us to demonstrate the unavoidable damage the SSEP project would cause if these permits are approved. This is the opportunity for our communities to show up and have their voices heard to oppose this unnecessary pipeline.” On Thursday, September 4 at 4:30pm, community members and grassroots organizations will hold: No SSEP! Rally to Protect Water in Harmon Park at 152 South Main Street, Kernersville, NC. The rally will take place before a public hearing on SSEP’s water quality certification application held by the NC Department of Environmental Quality. The hearing starts at 6 p.m. in the Kernersville Municipal Council Chambers, 134 East Mountain Street, Kernersville, NC. Private well users along the route welcomed the maps. “I’m glad this information will be available as I am definitely impacted by the proposed pipeline.” said Diana Garrison, a Guilford County resident, “I live in a neighborhood close to the pipeline, so all the homeowners’ wells are impacted by any leakage or seepage of toxins. Williams says they check to make sure their pipeline is safe, but we have yet to see anyone walking along pipeline in our area.” To view interactive maps of the SSEP, MVP Southgate, and T-15 pipeline routes visit cwfnc.org/nc-pipelines. The maps use data from a variety of public sources, including FracTracker Alliance, a non-profit organization educating the public about the risks from oil and gas projects. The maps show public water supplies, land within 1000ft of the proposed pipelines, the potential blast zone in the event of a pipeline accident, and drinking water sources at risk of pollution from all three pipelines. ### About Clean Water for North Carolina Clean Water for North Carolina is a non-profit promoting clean, safe water and environments and empowered, just communities for all North Carolinians through outreach, advocacy, education, and technical assistance. cwfnc.org  About Haw River Assembly Haw River Assembly is a 501(c)(3) non-profit citizens’ group founded in 1982 to restore and protect the Haw River and Jordan Lake, and to build a watershed community that shares this vision. Our goals are to promote environmental education, conservation and pollution prevention; to speak as a voice for the river in the public arena; and to put into peoples’ hands the tools and the knowledge they need to be effective guardians of the river. hawriver.org  Note: this press release was corrected to have the right month for Midway’s resolution opposing SSEP.


    Continue reading